• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / court filing fees / Los Angeles Court Filing Fees Increase Again . . .

Los Angeles Court Filing Fees Increase Again . . .

October 22, 2010 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

Access to the court system just became even more difficult for litigants whom have limited resources. In an unsurprising (yet still disappointing) move, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed SB 857, which increases filing fees in Los Angeles County and the rest of California. Additionally, because this bill includes an urgency clause, the new fees took effect upon the Governor’s execution of the document. In other words, the new filing fees are effective immediately.

Here is a list of some of the new fees:

  • First appearance in an unlimited civil action (over $25,000.00), Family law petitions, and Probate petitions by plaintiff(s) and each defendant will increase to $395.00. This fee increase applies to all types of filings in which the previous fee was $355.00 (civil, probate, family, etc…).
  • First appearance in a limited action ($10,000.00 up to $25,000.00) by plaintiff(s) and each defendant will increase to $370.00.
  • First appearance in a limited action (under $10,000.00) by plaintiff(s) and each defendant will increase to $220.00.

Note: The above fees do not include the additional fees required for Unlawful Detainer filings (additional $15.00) or the surcharges imposed in Riverside County, San Bernardino County, or the City and County of San Francisco.

  • Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication will increase to $500.00.
  • Application by counsel to appear Pro Hac Vice will increase to $500.00.
  • Adds an additional $3.00 penalty to every parking violation.
  • Additional increases in various criminal penalties and traffic fines.
  • A fee for telephonic appearances (a fee payable to the court in addition to fees paid to vendors). Fee has not been determined yet. An additional notice will be sent once we learn what this fee will be set at.

This is another example of what politicians do in Sacramento when they have failed to manage our resources properly. They increase fees. Pretty soon litigation will exclusively be the "sport of kings."

 

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: court filing fees, fees, Los Angeles, Miscellaneous Tagged With: "Los Angeles" "fees" "court filing fees"

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. catherin says

    December 10, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    If you have come up with an invention, then first of all make sure whether the product has been already patented or not.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to catherin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in