• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Celebrity Defamation / Twitterers Beware! Courtney Love Gets Sued For Tweets

Twitterers Beware! Courtney Love Gets Sued For Tweets

March 27, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 2 Comments

Warning! This post contains language which may be offensive to some. Please do not read it if you find profanity objectionable or if it makes you feel uncomfortable.

E Online! is reporting that Courtney Love is being sued in Los Angeles by a designer for defamation and other claims.

The "Hole" rockstar allegedly made outrageous statements about fashion designer Dawn Simorangkir on Twitter, Myspace, and other media, after Simorangkir sent Love an invoice for clothes Simorangkir had designed for Love.

Here are some of the more shocking allegations of libel in no particular order (spelling mistakes included):

  • "she has a history of dealing cocaine, lost all custody of her child, assualt, and burglary."
  • "nasty hosebag lying thief"
  • "she’s an assault addict herself"
  • "vile horrible lying bitch"
  • "is my clothes my WARDROBE! oi vey don’t fuck with my wradrobe or you willend up in a circle of corched eaeth hunted till your dead."

It is clear to anyone that if these allegation are true, they would be extremely offensive and defamatory. But that’s not the reason why I’m writing this post.

This case is novel not because of the alleged rantings of a celebrity, but because it is the first defamation lawsuit involving comments made on Twitter.

I have talked about it a lot of times on Twitter and I knew it would be coming soon. 

And now it’s here.

The point is that Twitterers need to be careful about what they post on Twitter.  It is too easy to post something that can come back to haunt you later. People have lost jobs or have been reprimanded for misusing Twitter, and yes, you can even get sued for internet defamation.

So now that I’ve pointed out the problem, what can you do to avoid getting sued on Twitter? Here you go:

  1. Listen To Your Mother – Remember when you mother said, "honey, if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all."  Well, your mother was absolutely right. Even if what you say is not technically defamation, you still might get sued. Do you want to get sued? I didn’t think so.
  2. Don’t Drink & Tweet – Drinking leads to stupid decision-making. Just don’t do it. I was thinking about tweeting during a friend’s bachelor party last weekend in Vegas, and someone gave me great advice. Don’t do it! He said. Because of his advice, what happened in Vegas will stay in Vegas.
  3. Don’t Use Your Real Name – If you insist on making negative comments about others, I would implore you not to use your real name on Twitter. You have a right to anonymous speech and you should exercise it. Just know that the law will hold you accountable if you break it; and know that if an experienced internet defamation lawyer wants to obtain your identity, he or she eventually will with enough effort. So I will repeat: Listen to your mother.

Did you like this post? If so, please subscribe right now via email to keep getting free updates. You can also follow me on Twitter at @adrianos

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Celebrity Defamation, Internet Defamation, Los Angeles Defamation, Twitter Internet Defamation Courtney Love Tagged With: 'Twitter Internet Defamation Courtney Love'

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. California Defamation Law Blog says

    May 12, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    Courtney Love Gets Sued For Tweets: Opposing Counsel Drops Two Key Claims

    You probably know by now that Courtney Love got sued last March for alleged defamatory Tweets. The allegations are THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS that I have ever seen. I sure hope that they’re not true for Ms. Love’s sake. Anyhow, here’s…

    Reply
  2. Lee Swales says

    November 25, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    Nice insight. Yes, Twitter defamation (libel) is becoming a massive issue. Lord McAlpine (UK politician) has just settled with the BBC and others on sexual abuse claims. For what it may be worth, my view on the this and other Twitter defamation cases here: http://regulatorylawsa.blogspot.com/2012/11/twitter-defamation-libel.html

    Reply

Leave a Reply to California Defamation Law Blog Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in