• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Internet Defamation / Small Businesses Strike Back!

Small Businesses Strike Back!

March 6, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 4 Comments

Yelp reviewers are the bane of many small businesses.  One reviewer can potentially devastate a business with a few keystrokes and the business owner has limited options to counter the impact of the review.  One of their options might be to file a defamation suit, but it is very difficult to pull off and in some situations makes the situation much worse.

Which is why I find Claire Cain Miller’s post today in the New York Times Bits’ blog so fascinating.

A pizzeria in San Francisco has decided to strike back!

They created T-shirts with the negative customer reviews on them and distributed them to their employees to wear.

This is a brilliant marketing tactic.  It is disarming, and I believe it will be effective for this business. However, I don’t believe this would work for professionals, e.g., lawyers, doctors, dentists.

What do you think?  Will this tactic work for the pizzeria?  

If you liked this post, please subscribe via e-mail or RSS to get free updates.

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Internet Defamation, yelp Tagged With: yelp defamation

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jake Myer says

    March 11, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    This is a brilliant idea. It eliminates the costs and time that come with law suits. It also avoids the possible bad publicity that can come when a company sues a website; that it makes the company look like a bunch of whiners, who instead of making good products, decided to sue. In fact, this move has generated good publicity (the cited NYT article).
    Additionally, when a customer sees the shirt and asks about it, they will get an explanation about the bad reviews on Yelp. A customer, who never would otherwise use Yelp, may have the intensive to post a good review.
    From the Lawyers point of view, ideas like this would endlessly please clients (assuming they work).

    Reply
  2. Adrianos Facchetti says

    March 11, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    Jake,
    I’m glad you liked the post. The restaurant’s idea is brilliant

    Reply
  3. campbell says

    October 22, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    So what are doctors and dentists supposed to do? We can’t respond to the defamation because of HIPPA . We deal with a**holes on a regular basis who rip us on rating sites because they don’t want to pay their bill or think we should have kissed their booty more for their lousy $10 copay. Do any of the reputation defender sites work? If so how do you choose one? Most of us don’t have the time to sue or the money for lawyers.

    Reply
  4. Greg says

    July 10, 2010 at 7:30 pm

    Wow, this isn’t rocket science folks. If your business is being targeted reviewer, it’s quite simple to post some fake “postive reviews” to counter balance. Ok so technically this is dishonest but do the yelpers represent a fair-cross section of your customer base anyway? Typically, you get a higher of proportion of gripers on review sites. It’s an unfair situation to begin with, so who says you have to play fair as a business?
    Not rocket science folks…

    Reply

Leave a Reply to campbell Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in