• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Correction / Demand A Correction Now!

Demand A Correction Now!

February 3, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

You must demand a correction now.  Let me tell you why.

California law limits the amount of damages a defamed party can sue for in certain circumstances depending on whether they have first demanded a correction.  If a defamatory statement is made on a radio broadcast and/or published in a newspaper, you must demand a correction (of the radio broadcaster or newspaper publisher) within 20 days after learning of the slanderous/libelous comments, pursuant to Civil Code section 48a.

If you don’t demand a correction within the applicable period of time you are limited to special damages.  This is potentially devastating because special damages generally refer to a quantifiable loss, e.g., loss of business profits, which is more difficult to establish than general damages.  It’s especially a big mistake to blow the 20 day period if the defendant’s statements were arguably made with malice because punitive damages are a "big stick" in defamation cases.  And trust me, you want to hold onto the big stick if you want to negotiate a settlement.

So it’s clear by now that you need to demand a correction.  Do it now.

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Correction, Damages, special Tagged With: Correction Special Damages

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Patrick says

    June 7, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Does this apply to television broadcasts as well?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Patrick Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in