• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Damages / The 3 Different Types Of Damages in Defamation Cases

The 3 Different Types Of Damages in Defamation Cases

January 27, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 12 Comments

A California court may award three kinds of damages to an aggrieved party in a defamation case. What are damages? Damages are monetary compensation for loss or injury to a person or property. In defamation cases, a court is attempting to measure the plaintiff’s loss of reputation as a result of the alleged defamatory statement or statements.

 


 

 

 There are three types of damages that may be sought in a defamation case according to California Civil Code section 48a, et seq.

  1. General Damages – these include "damages for loss of reputation, shame, mortification, and hurt feelings";
  2. Special Damages – these "are all damages plaintiff alleges and proves that he has suffered in respect to his property, trade, profession or occupation including such amounts of money as the plaintiff alleges and proves he has expended . . ."; and
  3. Exemplary Damages – "are damages which may be in the discretion of the court or jury to be recovered in addition to general and special damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing a defendant who has made the publication or broadcast with actual malice."

I’ll explain why it’s important to know what types of damages are available to you in a defamation case in an upcoming post.  

Stay tuned and stay informed.

 
Buffer Share

Filed Under: Damages, general, punitive, special Tagged With: "damages" "special" "general" "punitive"

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Joe says

    January 30, 2009 at 7:47 am

    So courts are now handing out money for “hurt feelings”? I predict a mountain of newly “hurt feelings” in this current economy.

    Reply
  2. Adrianos Facchetti says

    January 30, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Joe,
    There is nothing new about courts awarding damages for “hurt feelings.” But you’re right, I have seen a spike in client inquiries from people who have been allegedly defamed. The bottom line is, if someone has been defamed they are entitled to a recovery.

    Reply
  3. a2z says

    February 11, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Mr. Facchetti,
    In response to your statement
    -quote- ” if someone has been defamed they are entitled to a recovery.” -end quote-
    That is unless your defamed through court proceedings. Am I correct?

    Reply
  4. Adrianos Facchetti says

    February 11, 2009 at 11:21 am

    A2z,
    It would depend on a number of factors not the least of which, whether the litigation privilege applies.

    Reply
  5. a2z says

    February 11, 2009 at 11:24 am

    Mr. Facchetti,
    In response to your statement
    -quote- ” if someone has been defamed they are entitled to a recovery.” -end quote-
    That is unless your defamed through court proceedings. Am I correct?

    Reply
  6. a2z says

    February 11, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Mr. Facchetti,
    I am not an atty, but it is my understanding that lit/priv. do apply.
    A motion of contempt was filed by DOR where I attended a hearing -without- the judge.
    I proved to DOR the charges were false. She dismissed my evidence stating it was nothing.
    Then got upset with me and said she wanted to wait for the judge. Some 3.5 hours later my case went before the judge. -The last case in court I might add- Where DOR quickly retracted the contempt charges.
    However, there are still a false accusations published on the net.
    Would you agree this is privleged defamation?
    Thanks so much for your quick response!

    Reply
  7. michael says

    March 16, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    I was accused by a lawyer of improperly involving my students in the preparation of my expert’s report (among other things) and he sent a letter stating the above to 5 administrators. I’ve got a valid claim?

    Reply
  8. Jack et al. says

    April 16, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    So, a plaintiff can sue for defamation even if the statement(s) is the truth?
    For example, if a doctor materially harms a patient and the patient posts a review of the doctor online, could that be actionable as defamation/libel even though it’s true? Is the distinction if the patient says the doctor is a dirtbag, etc vs. the patient states what happened?

    Reply
  9. Joan Bigelow says

    July 16, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    Realtor list my property for short sale. emails me a proposal if he sell my property he will rebate back 20% of his commission when I buy my next house.
    I find another realtor that will rebate back 60% when I buy my next house. I tell the first realtor that when his listing is over I’m going to list with realtor #2.Realtor #1 emailed my employer that I’m guilty of loan fraud then emails that I’m guilty of elder abuse. My employer may fire me

    Reply
  10. treva mweresa says

    April 13, 2015 at 12:28 pm

    Truth is a defence for defamation, and if proven that the communication in question was true, it results to absolute exoneration for the defendant.

    Reply
  11. eunah says

    September 15, 2018 at 4:51 am

    no amount of money can ever be enough to pay for lost reputation or loss of good name

    Reply
  12. eric says

    October 22, 2019 at 7:03 am

    reputation can not be restored with money

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Joe Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in