• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Blog Protection 101 / 5 Ways To Avoid Being Sued On Your Blog

5 Ways To Avoid Being Sued On Your Blog

October 20, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti 5 Comments

"Avoid lawsuits beyond all things; they pervert your conscience, impair your health, and dissipate your property." -Jean de la Bruyere

Most lawsuits are avoidable and unnecessary. The key is to adopt a strategy that decreases the likelihood that you will be sued, and if you are sued, increases your chances of prevailing. For bloggers, this has become particularly important because of the recent rash of defamation lawsuits. If you follow the steps below, you’ll be in a better position whatever happens.

1. Check your sources and verify the facts – Factual assertions lead to lawsuits, whereas the law generally protects opinion as free speech (but not always — so be careful). Therefore, you must verify whether your factual assertions are accurate, if you are making any. And don’t rely on just any sources. Seek out credible and unbiased sources and keep a record of what you did to investigate the facts included in your post. If you’re simply writing an opinion piece, make it very clear that you’re doing just that.

2. Write About Public Figures Or Well-Known Businesses – If you write a post that is critical about an individual or a business, make sure they are very well-known. The law affords "public figures" lesser protection for various reasons. In other words, if a so-called public figure wants to sue you, they’re required to show that you made the alleged defamatory statement knowing it was false, or with a reckless disregard for the truth. That’s a very high standard to meet. On the other hand, if you wrote about Joe the Plumber (circa 2 weeks ago, when he was a private citizen), he’d have to show that you made the statements negligently–a much easier task.

3. Admit it When You’re Wrong – Issue a correction/retraction if you discover that your post contains false information. Don’t forget the human component here. Most people will not go to the trouble of suing you if you made an honest mistake and are willing to correct it. It might also be a good idea to request that Google remove all cached copies of the offending post.

4. Avoid Certain Subjects – You’re likely to be slapped with a defamation lawsuit if you write that someone was convicted, punished, etc., of a crime, or that they have contracted a serious disease or are unchaste, if it turns out to be untrue. Also, don’t write about something that may negatively affect the reputation of a business. Businesses usually have money and are more likely to hire an attorney to protect their good will and reputation.

5. Provide A Forum For Opposing Views – There has been an active discussion lately regarding whether bloggers should permit their readers to leave comments on their blogs. Bloggers should permit commentary because it provides a potentially aggrieved party with a forum to voice their concerns about a particular post, instead of in a court room.

Re-read the quote above. If you truly understand it, it just might change your life–or at least help you avoid a situation like the one below.

 

 

 

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Blog Protection 101, Defamation attorney in Los Angeles Tagged With: 'Defamation attorney in Los Angeles'

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Adrian L says

    October 20, 2008 at 10:34 am

    Great post – well done. If you’re taking suggestions, I’d love to see a follow-up post that demonstrates what qualifies as libel and slander. Any examples?
    -adrian @ JD Supra

    Reply
  2. Craig Niedenthal says

    November 5, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    Adrianos: Thanks for the info. I understand this is starting to become a more active area, even though I never really considered it in writing my blog posts.

    Reply
  3. YoRapper says

    November 14, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    As a blogger that has been sued more than once. It is best to give in to their demands and just remove the content and be nice about it. It’s not a big deal.

    Reply
  4. Vanessa says

    February 21, 2011 at 10:44 pm

    Fantastic Blog thanks for allowing others to benefit from your knowledge and expertise. I love your quote Facchetti! Quite true how lawsuits best be avoided. Nothing to brighten your day then a threatening letter from an attorney – or a negative yelp review that will leave you up till dawn wondering how to calculate the damage done to your hard earned reputation!

    Reply
  5. Andrew says

    February 22, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    Thank you, I learn a lot from your website, but one thing is still unclear. Can a person blog about the facts. For example, a blog about small claims court, post police reports, post photos etc. including the names and addresses of private individuals, even though those facts may be negative and may harm an individual’s reputation? I’m trying to think of another good example….posting someone’s arrest record, or facts about a drinking problem…like if your neighbor has 17 DUIs…can you blog about that and include their name and address and employer? (my gut tells me that’s going too far, but I don’t know if there is a law against it)

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Andrew Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in