• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Anti-SLAPP / “Anti-SLAPP”- Weapon of Choice for Defendants

“Anti-SLAPP”- Weapon of Choice for Defendants

September 23, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti 3 Comments

Beyond the obvious hurdles of proving a defamation case, a Plaintiff has to worry about what I call the “Bazooka,” (mainly because I love saying that word). The Bazooka is an anti-SLAPP motion. Such a motion allows a defendant to dispose of the case at an early stage of litigation and is found in California Civil Code of Procedure section 425.16, et seq. Basically, as long the defendant can show that the lawsuit is directed against free speech, defendant will prevail unless plaintiff can demonstrate a probability of prevailing on the merits. This is no easy task, especially in cases where the defendant contends that plaintiff is a public figure. Thus, the Bazooka.

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Anti-SLAPP, anti-slapp motion attorney Tagged With: "anti-slapp motion attorney"

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. California Defamation Law Blog says

    March 29, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    Defamation Law Chaos

    Say what you will about "Web 2.0" and the so-called "evolution" of the Internet. The fact is, the Internet is still the Wild Wild West, especially with respect to policing/regulating the web. Witness the herculean struggle in the Un…

    Reply
  2. California Defamation Law Blog says

    May 25, 2009 at 9:14 am

    Is A Mixed Cause Of Action Subject to Strike Under Section 425.16?

    WARNING: This post contains an advanced concept that may only be of interest to California defamation lawyers and other people who deal with anti-SLAPP motions on a regular basis. OK. With that disclaimer in mind, what in the heck is…

    Reply
  3. Annie Wagner says

    October 7, 2009 at 3:11 am

    Excellent blog this http://www.defamationlawblog.com well done and I was really pleased to stumble on : this it’s just what I needed to know.
    It’s taken me literally 2 hours and 27 minutes of searching the web to find http://www.defamationlawblog.com (lol) 😉
    But seriously I am really interested in Estate Agents normally and so I shall be very pleased to become a regular visitor
    See you soon

    Reply

Leave a Reply to California Defamation Law Blog Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in