Defamation Defense: Other Proceedings

It used to be that statements made before private bodies were not absolutely privileged under Civil Code section 47(b).  This meant that statements made at a judicial commission at a private medical society were not absolutely privileged, for example.

Noting a gap in the law, the California legislature made it such that statements made "in the initiation or course of any proceeding authorized by law," and reviewable by mandamus would be absolutely privileged.  Civ. Code 47(b)(4).

In order for a proceeding to be reviewable by mandamus three elements must be present:

  • a hearing is required to be given;
  • evidence is required to be taken; and
  • discretion in the determination of facts is vested in an inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or officer are present.

This means that statements made during grievance proceedings pursuant to collective bargaining agreements could be absolutely privileged.

This change in the law was important because it broadened the scope of the absolute privilege to quasi-judicial proceedings, which had previously not been seen by the courts as "official."

If you liked this post please subscribe to the California Defamation Law Newsletter to receive a FREE copy of the  "The Ultimate Beginner’s Guide To Defamation Law."

 

Related Posts:

What Are the Defenses To A Claim For Defamation?

Truth Is A Defense To A Claim Of Defamation

Defamation Defense: Discharge of Official Duty

Defamation Defense: Judicial Proceeding

Defamation Defense: Legislative Proceeding

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *