• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Archives for Attorneys' Fees

Attorneys' Fees

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

June 28, 2022 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Plaintiffs often incorrectly point to their attorney's fees and costs to set the standard for what is reasonable. Plaintiffs will urge a court to use their attorney's claimed expenditure of time as the yardstick for an award of fees. However, courts "should defer to the winning lawyer's professional judgment as to how much time he was required to spend on the case." Moreno v. … [Read more...] about Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

June 24, 2022 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

In most cases a court is not permitted to consider settlement offers under Evidence Code section 1152, which makes "inadmissible" evidence that is offered to "prove [the offeror's] liability for the loss." The main purpose of this rule is to encourage settlement. However, that section does not prohibit a judge from considering a plaintiff's rejection of a settlement offer when … [Read more...] about May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

June 15, 2022 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

After prevailing on an anti-SLAPP motion, counsel will file often file a separate motion for attorney's fees and costs. In order to obtain a recovery, counsel has the burden to substantiate the fees and costs. While invoices are not required, courts often prefer them (or other detailed time entries). One issue that comes up often is whether to redact attorney-client … [Read more...] about Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Bauer SLAPPs Beckham With A Huge Motion For Attorney Fees

March 11, 2011 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

I know David Beckham's defeat at the hands of Bauer Publishing is somewhat old news. But no one seems to have commented specifically about the merits of the massive motion for attorney fees filed against Beckham. Just how much is Bauer seeking in attorneys' fees? More than $250,000 in fees and costs! Just for an anti-SLAPP motion! To give you a point of reference, I'd say that … [Read more...] about Bauer SLAPPs Beckham With A Huge Motion For Attorney Fees

Plaintiff’s Attorneys Are Not Liable For anti-SLAPP Fees

October 24, 2010 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

Until recently it was an open question whether an attorney could be held liable jointly and severally with his or her client for attorneys' fees pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute. But the Second District Court of Appeal, located in Los Angeles, recently put this issue to bed. In Moore v. Kaufman, Justice Rothschild expounded an excellent analysis and concluded that the … [Read more...] about Plaintiff’s Attorneys Are Not Liable For anti-SLAPP Fees

Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

May a court adjust the lodestar upward based on exceptional representation?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in