• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Blogs

Blogs

Twitter Wins One Motion to Quash a Subpoena Seeking the Identifying Information of its User And Loses Another: A Case Study in Dealing With Applications for Production of Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782

January 25, 2020 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Two recent back-to-back decisions involving the same plaintiff and the same magistrate in the  United States Northern District of California illustrate when a court would—and would not—likely grant a request to unmask an anonymous poster pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782.   In re Yasuda, No. 19-MC-80127-TSH, 2019 WL 4933581 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2019) (Yasuda … [Read more...] about Twitter Wins One Motion to Quash a Subpoena Seeking the Identifying Information of its User And Loses Another: A Case Study in Dealing With Applications for Production of Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782

Must an anti-SLAPP defendant submit declarations in order to satisfy their prong one burden?

May 1, 2018 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

The Second District Court of Appeals recently issued a significant opinion in Bel Air Internet, LLC v. Morales (2018) 20 Cal.App.4th 924. In Bel Air, the plaintiff brought claims for (1) intentional interference with contractual relations; (2) breach of contract; (3) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (4) conversion (against one defendant … [Read more...] about Must an anti-SLAPP defendant submit declarations in order to satisfy their prong one burden?

Consumer Review Websites Have Standing to Assert the Rights of Their Users to Remain Unknown

February 18, 2018 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Until recently, no California court had squarely addressed the issue of whether a consumer review website has to standing to assert the First Amendment rights of its users to remain anonymous.  As the Sixth District Court of Appeal observed: “A decade ago, [this was] a relatively novel question. Now, however, a substantial preponderance of national authority favors the rule … [Read more...] about Consumer Review Websites Have Standing to Assert the Rights of Their Users to Remain Unknown

Are Statements About Future Events Defamatory?

September 14, 2016 by Adrianos Facchetti 3 Comments

As I've written about before, there is a thin and often elusive line between what is actionable defamation and what is non-actionable opinion. An example of a type of statement that often confounds lawyers is one that appears to be a false statement of fact, but is actually an opinion about a future event or outcome. These statements usually arise from predictions about the … [Read more...] about Are Statements About Future Events Defamatory?

Corporations May Not Maintain A Claim For False Light

December 5, 2015 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

Plaintiffs often make the mistake of alleging claims of false light on behalf of corporations. This often occurs when the case also involves individual plaintiffs, particularly in the context of internet defamation. It springs from a fundamental misunderstanding of the law. But California does not recognize a claim for false light for corporations. “This is because the tort … [Read more...] about Corporations May Not Maintain A Claim For False Light

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in