• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Blogs

Blogs

Are anti-SLAPP Motions the Proper Vehicle to Attack Derivative Claims? Dickenson v. Cosby (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 655

June 16, 2020 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Janice Dickenson, a well-known celebrity and model, filed an action against Bill Cosby, also well-known TV personality and comedian, for defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. After going public with accusations of rape against Cosby, Dickenson received a demand letter and discovered a press release, both issued by Cosby’s attorney Martin … [Read more...] about Are anti-SLAPP Motions the Proper Vehicle to Attack Derivative Claims? Dickenson v. Cosby (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 655

Planet Aid Inc. v. Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting (2020 WL 1701960) Order re: Outstanding Discovery Disputes and Anti-SLAPP Motion

May 23, 2020 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16, subdivision (g) states that “[a]ll discovery proceedings in the action shall be stayed upon the filing of a notice of [an anti-SLAPP] motion” and the stay “shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion[,] or in the event a party files a noticed motion seeking additional discovery and establishes good cause … [Read more...] about Planet Aid Inc. v. Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting (2020 WL 1701960) Order re: Outstanding Discovery Disputes and Anti-SLAPP Motion

In re Facebook, Inc. Internet Tracking Litig.: Tracking users’ internet history: When is it an invasion of privacy, and when is it a statutory violation?

May 3, 2020 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

A recent Ninth Circuit appeals case involving Facebook and Facebook users drew a clear line in the sand on multiple issues pertaining to Facebook’s practice of gathering user’s browser histories, through the use of cookies, after the user logged out of Facebook. Plaintiffs, Facebook users, filed a complaint against the social media mogul claiming, among other things, … [Read more...] about In re Facebook, Inc. Internet Tracking Litig.: Tracking users’ internet history: When is it an invasion of privacy, and when is it a statutory violation?

Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 109

April 15, 2020 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

In a recent case out of San Francisco County, the court of appeals concluded that the trial court failed to adequately consider all of the relevant factors under the Stored Communications Act to show good cause to allow the disclosure of private social media communications. Defendants were indicted on gang-related charges related to a drive by shooting. Defendants served a … [Read more...] about Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 109

Six4Three, LLC v. Facebook

March 7, 2020 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Six4Three, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2019, No. A154890) 2019 WL 4784420 In 2012 Plaintiff Six4Three, LLC, developed an app called “Pikinis,” which searched Facebook for photos of people wearing bikinis. Anyone who downloaded Pinkinis could instantly search images posted not only by Facebook users, but also by friends of users. Noting the obvious … [Read more...] about Six4Three, LLC v. Facebook

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in