• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Anti-SLAPP / Bauer SLAPPs Beckham With A Huge Motion For Attorney Fees

Bauer SLAPPs Beckham With A Huge Motion For Attorney Fees

March 11, 2011 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

I know David Beckham’s defeat at the hands of Bauer Publishing is somewhat old news. But no one seems to have commented specifically about the merits of the massive motion for attorney fees filed against Beckham.

Just how much is Bauer seeking in attorneys’ fees? More than $250,000 in fees and costs! Just for an anti-SLAPP motion! To give you a point of reference, I’d say that most anti-SLAPP motions are litigated for somewhere between $10,000 and $50,000. Sometimes it’s a bit less if it’s a fairly straightforward motion. And sometimes it’s a bit more if the evidence is voluminous or when the issues involved are novel or complex. There are a handful of cases where courts have granted fee requests in the two to three hundred thousand dollar range. BUT IN THIS CASE? REALLY?

It’s hard for me to believe that Bauer’s attorneys spent over 500 hours litigating this motion. I am definitely looking forward to reading the opposing and reply papers and, ultimately the Court’s decision on this.

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Anti-SLAPP, Attorneys' Fees, defamation defense attorney Tagged With: "defamation defense attorney"

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in