• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Anti-SLAPP / The California Supreme Court’s anti-SLAPP Decisions

The California Supreme Court’s anti-SLAPP Decisions

May 22, 2010 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Here is a list of the California Supreme Court’s 24 decisions to date regarding the SLAPP statute. This is a great starting point to learn about this very complicated and interesting area of law. Here they are in reverse chronological order.

  1. Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. v. Pierce Gore (2010) WL 1948283
  2. Vargas v. City of Salinas (2009) 46 Cal.4th 1
  3. In re Episcopal Church Cases (2009) 45 Cal.4th 467
  4. Club Members For An Honest Election v. Sierra Club (2008) 45 Cal.4th 309
  5. Freeman v. Schack (2007) 154 Cal.App.4th 719
  6. Taus v. Loftus (2007) 40 Cal.4th 683
  7. Kolar v. Donahue, McIntosh & Hammerton (2006) 1532
  8. Barrett v. Rosenthal (2006) 40 Cal.4th 33
  9. S.B. Beach Properties v. Berti (2006) 39 Cal.4th 374
  10. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif (2006) 39 Cal.4th 260
  11. Flatley v. Mauro (2006) 39 Cal.4th 299
  12. Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hosp. Dist. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 192
  13. Rusheen v. Cohen (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1048
  14. Premier Medical Management Sytems, Inc. v. California Ins. Guarantee Ass’n (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 550
  15. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino (2005) 35 Cal.4th 180
  16. Gates v. Discovery Communications, Inc. (2004) 34 Cal.4th 679
  17. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2004) 34 Cal.4th 553
  18. Zamos v. Stroud (2004) 32 Cal.4th 958
  19. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche (2003) 31 Cal.4th 728
  20. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53
  21. Navellier v. Sletten (2002) 29 Cal.4th 82
  22. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & Chidester (2002) 28 Cal.4th 811
  23. Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122
  24. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1106

 

 

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Anti-SLAPP, California, case, decision, law, opinion, Supreme Tagged With: California, case, decision, law, opinion, Supreme

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in