• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / 2009 / Archives for December 2009

Archives for December 2009

How Long Do You Have To File An Anti-SLAPP Motion?

December 8, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

A section 425.16 motion (AKA anti-SLAPP motion) must be filed no later than 60 days after service of the complaint or amended complaint. Of course, a court has discretion to allow an anti-SLAPP motion to be filed after 60 days. CCP 425.16(f). In addition, unlike other motions to strike (or a demurrer), an anti-SLAPP motion may be heard before or after a defendant files an … [Read more...] about How Long Do You Have To File An Anti-SLAPP Motion?

What Is A “Public Forum” For Purposes Of The Anti-SLAPP Statute?

December 7, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

The purpose of the so-called “SLAPP” statute is to eliminate lawsuits brought “primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional right of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances.” Code Civ. Proc. Section 425.16(a). Courts engage in a two-part analysis focusing first on whether the disputed cause of action arises from … [Read more...] about What Is A “Public Forum” For Purposes Of The Anti-SLAPP Statute?

U.S. Student Amanda Knox Convicted Of . . .

December 4, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 4 Comments

You probably thought I was going to write that Amanda Knox was convicted of murder. And while you're correct that Ms. Knox was convicted of that crime in Italy today, that's not what I was going to write. Did you know that Ms. Knox was also convicted of defamation? It's true. Ms. Knox implicated another man in the murder earlier in the investigation and, guess what, defamation … [Read more...] about U.S. Student Amanda Knox Convicted Of . . .

Can You Amend A Complaint After An Anti-SLAPP Motion Is Filed?

December 3, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

You're a plaintiff and you just received an anti-SLAPP motion from the defendant. Your lawyer reviews the motion and determines that it is persuasive and is likely to result in a victory for the defendant, unless your complaint is amended. Is the court required to permit an amendment under section 425.16? Does the court have discretion to allow you to amend the complaint? The … [Read more...] about Can You Amend A Complaint After An Anti-SLAPP Motion Is Filed?

Filing A Lawsuit In A Foreign Country: Protected Conduct Under The Anti-SLAPP Statute?

December 2, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

This is a brand new case (filed yesterday) by the California Court of Appeal, Second District, located in Los Angeles. Guessous v. Chrome Hearts, LLC (2009) WL 4263833. The plaintiffs are Mohammed Amal Guessous ("Guessous") and Five Bis.  Guessous is a U.S. citizen and resident of Los Angeles. He has an ownership interest in Five Bis, a French limited … [Read more...] about Filing A Lawsuit In A Foreign Country: Protected Conduct Under The Anti-SLAPP Statute?

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in