• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / 2009 / Archives for December 2009

Archives for December 2009

Party Opposing Anti-SLAPP Motion Must Present Competent, Admissible Evidence

December 22, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

I came across a case the other day which spelled out an unsexy, but no less important concept of anti-SLAPP law. Not knowing this concept may spell doom whether you're bringing or opposing an anti-SLAPP motion. While it is unsurprising that many in pro per parties miss the boat on this one, many attorneys also screw this one up. What am I talking about? I'm talking about the … [Read more...] about Party Opposing Anti-SLAPP Motion Must Present Competent, Admissible Evidence

Anti-SLAPP Law: Legal Malpractice Trap For The Unwary? Part II

December 21, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

I pointed out last week here that anti-SLAPP law is much more complicated and nuanced than you might expect, and therefore, that it could present a legal malpractice TRAP for the unwary. I repeat: drafting an anti-SLAPP motion is not like doing your average demurrer for failure to state a cause of action or motion to strike. It is much more time intensive (in vast majority of … [Read more...] about Anti-SLAPP Law: Legal Malpractice Trap For The Unwary? Part II

Leave To Amend A Complaint After A Successful Anti-SLAPP Motion?

December 21, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 2 Comments

You are a plaintiff in a lawsuit and the defendant filed and won an anti-SLAPP motion striking your entire complaint. May a court grant you leave to amend the complaint? In other words, will the court let you "fix the problem" with your complaint. No. Simmons v. Allstate Co. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1073. The purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute is to eliminate … [Read more...] about Leave To Amend A Complaint After A Successful Anti-SLAPP Motion?

Is A Statement Of Decision Required On An Order For An Anti-SLAPP Motion?

December 19, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

You might expect that a statement of decision is required on an order for an anti-SLAPP motion. Such a motion involves important interests (Constitutional interests) and is much more involved than your average motion (demurrer, motion to strike). It requires the parties to submit evidence which would be admissible at trial, has the potential to end a case, and such an order is … [Read more...] about Is A Statement Of Decision Required On An Order For An Anti-SLAPP Motion?

Can You File A SLAPP Suit And Then Dismiss It Without Any Consequences?

December 18, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

The mere threat of an anti-SLAPP motion (or serving the motion on the other party) may be sufficient to cause them to dismiss the suit before a hearing on the merits. Under those circumstances, are there consequences for the dismissing party? The court in Moore faced this issue and presented it clearly: "This appeal addresses the question whether the plaintiff in a … [Read more...] about Can You File A SLAPP Suit And Then Dismiss It Without Any Consequences?

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in