• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / amend / Leave To Amend A Complaint After A Successful Anti-SLAPP Motion?

Leave To Amend A Complaint After A Successful Anti-SLAPP Motion?

December 21, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti 2 Comments

You are a plaintiff in a lawsuit and the defendant filed and won an anti-SLAPP motion striking your entire complaint. May a court grant you leave to amend the complaint? In other words, will the court let you "fix the problem" with your complaint.

No. Simmons v. Allstate Co. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1073.

The purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute is to eliminate meritless lawsuits at an early stage of litigation before it becomes too expensive to defend. Allowing plaintiffs to amend a complaint after a court has granted an anti-SLAPP motion would run contrary to the state purpose of section 425.16.

If you liked this post please subscribe to the California Defamation newsletter to learn more about defamation law and get tips on how to protect your reputation on the Internet.

Buffer Share

Filed Under: amend, Anti-SLAPP, Complaint, statute Tagged With: amend, complaint, statute

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. David says

    September 23, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    What happens if:
    Court improperly grants SLAPPors’ request for leave to amend?
    SLAPPor files an Amended Complaint.
    SLAPPee filed another anti-SLAPP and wins.
    SLAPPor appeals.
    SLAPPOR says SLAPPee waived the error by responding with his second anti-SLAPP motion.
    Who wins and why?

    Reply
  2. Rita O'Flynn says

    October 22, 2010 at 8:23 am

    What, if any, steps can be taken in tha case where the plaintiff has filed an amended complaint before the decision was made granting the defendants their anti-slapp motion?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in