• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Defamation / Unintended Publication

Unintended Publication

July 2, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

If you’ve been reading the California Defamation Law Blog for any period of time, you’d know that publication is a necessary element of any cause of action for defamation.

What you probably don’t know, however, is that the publication element can be met even if the publication was unintentional, or negligent.

For example, suppose I send you a personal letter to your house full of all sorts of defamatory statements.  Suppose as well, that I know you are rarely home and that other people in your home may read your e-mail.

While this would not constitute an intentional publication since I addressed it only to you, it would most certainly constitute negligent publication because I knew that you were seldom at home and that other people might read my letter.

On the other hand, suppose you live alone and that I send you the same letter and someone steals my letter before it gets to you and they post it on the Internet.  Well, this would probably not constitute publication because it is not foreseeable that someone might steal my letter.

So, the bottom line is that publication can be negligent and intentional.  I bet you didn’t know that.

If you liked this post, please feel free to subscribe over on the right-hand side of this page to get more FREE updates like this one via email or RSS.

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Defamation, publication Tagged With: publication

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in