• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Defamation / Defamation Hotlinks: 1/19/09-1/23/09

Defamation Hotlinks: 1/19/09-1/23/09

January 23, 2009 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

I scour the Internet for defamation stories and posts every day because I am passionate about the law of defamation.  Because I find so many interesting articles/posts on a regular basis, I thought I would share some of them with my readers through a new series here at the California Defamation Law Blog, called, "Defamation Hotlinks."  Every Friday I’ll post the most interesting articles/stories regarding libel, slander, and defamation on the Internet and offline.  I hope you enjoy.

1.  Dozier Internet Law on Public Citizen Bullying – I deeply respect John Dozier’s opinion in the area of internet defamation and cyber-bullying.  In this post, he writes about a recent call by others for broadening the immunity of section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to cover websites that allow trademark infringement.  While Mr. Dozier is unapologetically pro-business, his views are consistent with the current state of defamation law, and I believe his predictions regarding the future in this area of law will bear out.

2. Dixie Chicks Face Defamation Lawsuit After Using Court Records – If Mr. Dozier is pro-business, Citizen Media is definitely pro-individual.  The interesting part of this article is Citizen Media’s discussion of the "fair report privilege."  This privilege has historically protected traditional media outlets from defamation suits.  The question is whether this privilege will be extended to independent bloggers in the near future in the same way it is applied to the mainstream media.

3. Inside The First Amendment: Technology Changing Our Approach To Free Expression – Gene Policinski, of the First Amendment Center, provides a brief, but fascinating overview of how technology is changing our approach to First Amendment issues. My favorite line from the piece is:  "How does the law punish perpetual harm or compensate for perpetual defamation?"

Did I miss any key stories on defamation?  If you think I did, please submit them to me for consideration for next week’s Hotlinks.

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Defamation

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in