• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Defamation / Why You Don’t Need A Lawyer In Most Defamation Cases

Why You Don’t Need A Lawyer In Most Defamation Cases

December 9, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

Most defamation cases are simply too small for a lawyer to handle and too costly for the average plaintiff to sustain.  The cost of litigation can easily exceed $50,000 and most lawyers charge by the hour and demand a significant retainer upfront.

So what do you do if you’ve just been defamed?

 

 One answer is to file a complaint in Small Claims court. Small Claims court provides a relatively quick and inexpensive method to pursue your rights.  An individual can file a claim of up to $7,500 and a corporation or other business entity can file a claim up to $5,000.  Here is a list of some of the following benefits of filing in Small Claims Court.

  1. It’s quick – you can generally get a court date within one month from the date you file the complaint.  That’s lightning fast in the legal world, especially given that most normal cases can drag on for years before they get to trial.  You also want a quick resolution because the defamation may be ongoing and your reputation may be suffering as a result.
  2. It’s inexpensive – the filing fee is typically between $30 and $75, depending on how much you are claiming.
  3. It’s decisive – The court will render a decision regarding the merits of your claim on the appointed date and fashion an appropriate remedy based on the facts presented to the court. Courts may issue a money award and/or order the defendant to stop publishing comments about you or your business.

While you don’t need to hire an attorney in most cases (in fact, attorneys are not permitted to appear in small claims court), it may be to your advantage to seek an experienced attorney’s advice before going before a judge, especially in situations involving internet defamation.  You do not want to waste your time and money on a claim that has little or no merit.

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Defamation

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Mark Merenda says

    December 9, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Thanks for this valuable info!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in