• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / 2008 / Archives for November 2008

Archives for November 2008

Foreign Court Decides Linking To Third Party Content Is Not Libel

November 18, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

The Canadian Supreme Court held that linking to third party content is not libel in Crookes v. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (Sup. Ct. Aug. 29, 2008).  For a detailed discussion of the case, read Jeffrey D. Neuburger's post at Mediashift.  Since the court limited its ruling to the particular facts of the case, it left open the possibility of future libel … [Read more...] about Foreign Court Decides Linking To Third Party Content Is Not Libel

Linking to third-party content: Does Section 230 Provide Immunity?

November 17, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Eric Goldman of the Technology Law Blog seems to think so and I agree.  The Communications Decency Act was passed in 1996 and later was interpreted by courts to immunize internet service providers form torts committed by users of their systems.  In specific, it says: "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher … [Read more...] about Linking to third-party content: Does Section 230 Provide Immunity?

Lawyer In Defamation Case Sanctioned $14,000

November 17, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

A lawyer being sued by a New York law firm for defamation made the unfortunate mistake of attempting to implead opposing counsel as a third-party defendant in the lawsuit.  As a result, the attorney was sanctioned by the court in the sum of $14,000 for employing a "frivolous" tactic.  For more about this story, read the Corporate Legal Times.  This … [Read more...] about Lawyer In Defamation Case Sanctioned $14,000

Plaintiffs May Remain Anonymous In Internet Defamation Cases

November 15, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

Lisa H. Miller writes in the Internet Defamation Law Blog about Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant # 1, 06-1590-cv (2nd Cir. 2008), a case which addresses the question:  "Can a plaintiff sue anonymously in an internet defamation setting?"  The answer is yes, as long as the plaintiff's need to remain anonymous outweighs the public's need for … [Read more...] about Plaintiffs May Remain Anonymous In Internet Defamation Cases

Does the U.S. Need A National Speech Code?

November 10, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

I wrote a post not too long ago about "defamation of religion" and the United Nations.  After reading Steven Groves' excellent article, "Why the U.S. Should Oppose "Defamation of Religions" Resolutions at the United Nations", I am firmly convinced that the First Amendment as we understand it today is in danger.  It is well known … [Read more...] about Does the U.S. Need A National Speech Code?

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in