• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Blog Protection 101 / Bloggers Under Siege in Los Angeles With Defamation Lawsuits

Bloggers Under Siege in Los Angeles With Defamation Lawsuits

October 16, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti 2 Comments

It’s rough out here in Los Angeles for bloggers who report on the practices of real estate companies and mortgage lenders! According to a story in the L.A. times, entitled, “R.E. Blogs Under Attack,” Mortgage Lender Implode-o-meter, and Blown Mortgage have been sued recently in Los Angeles County for defamation. The California Defamation Law Blog will keep an eye on these cases and report back to you with any news as it becomes available. But for the time being, I want to make an important point that I’ve been making for the last two months, and the point is this: Lawsuits against bloggers have increased dramatically in recent years, and in my opinion, will continue to rise. Why do I say this? Well, for two reasons: (1) more people are starting blogs everyday, and (2) more people are getting their information on the internet, which increases the impact of blogs with respect to the public, and thereby increases the potential for damage to an individual or companies’ reputation.

So, how do you protect yourself if you’re a blogger? I’ll answer that question in the upcoming weeks in a series that I’m going to call, Blog Protection 101. Trust me, if you’re a blogger you don’t want to miss this. And if you’re not a blogger don’t worry. I’m going to sprinkle in some other general posts about developments in California Defamation law, too.

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Blog Protection 101, Los Angeles defamation attorney Tagged With: 'Los Angeles defamation attorney'

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Brett Trout says

    October 16, 2008 at 2:20 pm

    Interesting post, but how to these plaintiffs: 1) quantify their damages and 2) attribute those damages to the defendants?

    Reply
  2. Adrianos Facchetti Facchetti says

    October 16, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    That’s a good question, Brett. Damages have always been difficult to quantify in the defamation context because courts are essentially putting a value on reputation. What is it worth? But, increasingly, we are seeing courts use a market share approach. Question number two merits an entire post.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in