What Is Cyberstalking?

Cyberstalking is the use of electronic media to stalk, harass, or seriously alarm or annoy another person. With the increasing use of the Internet and electronic devices, more and more people are using such media to strike fear and terror into the hearts of others. In fact, many believe that cyberstalking has become more common than physical stalking, which makes sense given that nearly everyone has access to a computer or a mobile device these days.

Stalkers use several means to harass and intimidate their victims. They follow the online movements of their victims and attempt to gather information about them. Stalkers will post private information about the victim on the Internet, typically in order to cause fear or embarrassment. For example, they will post the person's social security number or their telephone number and then post it on a site, urging others to call the site repeatedly, causing the victim severe mental and emotional anguish. Or in other instances they will post pictures of a personal nature (sexual) on sites.

But by far the most common tactic of the internet stalker is to publish false and tremendously damaging statements about the victim, in an attempt to destroy the victim's reputation. This is defamation.

All of this behavior takes a tremendous toll on the victim and is very serious. Fortunately, California has passed a number of criminal and civil laws to deal with these kinds of issues. However, there are a number of potential pitfalls and, like most things, it is usually best to hire a professional to help you put an end to the stalker's behavior.

It's the Type of Experience that Counts

I'm reading an excellent book by Bryan Garner and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, entitled "Making Your Case."

The first page contains a profound quote by T.W. Wakeling:

"Experience is undoubtedly a great teacher, yet it may be counterproductive if what has been cultivated and refined are bad habits. The point is that excellence is the product of diligent study and application of sound principles, not simply the accumulation of time logged in . . . courts."

Wakeling's astute observation mirrors my previous comments in a post about measuring the value of an attorney's services. The difficulty, from a potential client's perspective, is how to determine whether an attorney has "cultivated and refined bad habits," or whether he has diligently studied and applied sound principles. Having 20 plus years of experience does sound impressive and would lead the average person to believe that that should be enough time to achieve proficiency in any area. But there is little to no correlation in my experience between "time logged in courts" and legal ability.

I think the better approach would be to review what other clients and attorneys have said about the attorney, read articles the attorney has written about that area of law, and discover the kind of results the attorney has been able to achieve with clients like you in cases like yours.

 

Traverse Legal Establishes Of Counsel Relationship With Adrianos Facchetti

I am pleased to announce that the Law Office of Adrianos Facchetti has established an Of Counsel relationship with Traverse Legal, a niche law firm based out of Michigan that handles cutting edge issues in Trademark, Copyright, and Domain dispute matters. Some of the largest and most successful companies in the world select Traverse Legal to handle matters within their areas of expertise.

I am excited to work with them and I am glad to share the good news with you.

Thanks and enjoy the holidays.

 

Los Angeles Court Filing Fees Increase Again . . .

Access to the court system just became even more difficult for litigants whom have limited resources. In an unsurprising (yet still disappointing) move, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed SB 857, which increases filing fees in Los Angeles County and the rest of California. Additionally, because this bill includes an urgency clause, the new fees took effect upon the Governor's execution of the document. In other words, the new filing fees are effective immediately.

Here is a list of some of the new fees:

  • First appearance in an unlimited civil action (over $25,000.00), Family law petitions, and Probate petitions by plaintiff(s) and each defendant will increase to $395.00. This fee increase applies to all types of filings in which the previous fee was $355.00 (civil, probate, family, etc...).
  • First appearance in a limited action ($10,000.00 up to $25,000.00) by plaintiff(s) and each defendant will increase to $370.00.
  • First appearance in a limited action (under $10,000.00) by plaintiff(s) and each defendant will increase to $220.00.

Note: The above fees do not include the additional fees required for Unlawful Detainer filings (additional $15.00) or the surcharges imposed in Riverside County, San Bernardino County, or the City and County of San Francisco.

  • Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication will increase to $500.00.
  • Application by counsel to appear Pro Hac Vice will increase to $500.00.
  • Adds an additional $3.00 penalty to every parking violation.
  • Additional increases in various criminal penalties and traffic fines.
  • A fee for telephonic appearances (a fee payable to the court in addition to fees paid to vendors). Fee has not been determined yet. An additional notice will be sent once we learn what this fee will be set at.

This is another example of what politicians do in Sacramento when they have failed to manage our resources properly. They increase fees. Pretty soon litigation will exclusively be the "sport of kings."

 

 

You've Been Sued . . . Now What?

You wake up one morning and get ready for work, as you would any other morning. You step outside your door and a stranger lunges at you with a fistful of papers in his hands and says, "you've been served." You are shocked, angry, and afraid all in the same moment.

What do you do?

Like most people, at first you do nothing. You place the stack of papers (which might as well be written in Greek) on your coffee table and ignore it for at least a few days. Then you build up the courage to read through the papers. You see something called a "Summons" and then another longer document called a "Complaint." The "Summons" advises you that you have only 30 days in which to respond to the Complaint. The Complaint describes, in strange and confusing language, a story you know well. Perhaps you made a comment at work about an employee whom you believed embezzled company funds. Or maybe you wrote a fiery anonymous blog post about your doctor. In any event, there you are, being described in cold, black print and you are being sued for defamation, libel, slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. You've heard of something called "defamation of character" but you're not really sure what that means, and you certainly don't know what the other terms mean. The first page of the Complaint says that you are being sued in the "Los Angeles Superior Court, Central District," and you think that is quite strange because you live in Orange County.

At some point you convince yourself that you need to take action and deal with this lawsuit. You call your uncle John and ask him if he knows of a good lawyer. He refers you to a very good criminal defense attorney whom he met at the golf course a few years back. You call the criminal defense attorney and schedule a consultation with him. You meet with him at his office and he tells you that he will need an initial retainer of $15,000.00. You don't ask him any questions about his qualifications. You assume that because he is a lawyer he can handle your particular case. You borrow money from you grandparents to pay the lawyer to defend you.

Your lawyer mounts an aggressive, but inefficient defense of your case. He asks you to answer sets of questions called Form interrogatories, Request for Admissions, Request for Production of Documents, and Special Interrogatories. You answer them. Then you are told you need to have your deposition taken. You prepare with your lawyer over the phone and then go to the other attorney's office. You answer questions for a number of hours.

Months later, and also about $40,000.00 later, you are encouraged to mediate the case with a retired judge. While at the mediation, you are advised to write an apology and to pay the plaintiff a sum of money, which you do not have but will have to borrow to make this nightmare end. You pay it and sign some documents. It is over, but your life has changed dramatically. You now owe $40,000.00 and your family is upset with you.

So where did you go wrong?

If you have experienced something like the above scenario, then it will seem very familiar to you. If you have not, then you should listen up because I'm about to tell you how to deal with a lawsuit and how to properly select an attorney.

How to Deal With a Lawsuit

  1. Take Action Immediately: You normally have 30 days in which to respond to a Complaint. You will likely need the entire time for a number of reasons. First, you will need to find and interview at least two attorneys. Second, once you hire the attorney he will need time to prepare a response. In many cases, the attorney will be able to get a 2 or 3 week extension in which to file a response, but not always so you need to act fast. In the case of a potential anti-SLAPP motion, for which you would have 60 days in which to respond, you would still need to act quickly because these kinds of motions are labor intensive.
  2. Find the Right Attorney: There are many ways to find an attorney. One of the best ways is to get a referral from a friend or family member of an attorney who handles the specific problem you are facing. If that doesn't yield any worthwhile results, try calling your local bar association. Los Angeles, where I am located, has an excellent bar association and does provide referrals. Another option is to search the Internet. Do a "Google" search of the person's name and perhaps the practice area, e.g., "defamation lawyer", or "Los Angeles Defamation Lawyer." You will find a number of results. If the attorney has a website or blog, see if they have experience in the area. Once you find 2 or 3 attorneys that you feel have experience in the area of law, call them to schedule an appointment. The attorney will likely answer the phone and will ask you a number of questions. Be ready with a short speech (because lawyers are very busy and will be turned off if you ramble) and be respectful of the lawyer's time. Even better, e-mail the lawyer with a short summary of the case--no more than 2 or 3 short paragraphs and leave your contact information at the end of the e-mail and the best times to reach you.
  3. Prepare for the Appointment: If the lawyer contacts you and advises you that he would like to meet with you, make sure to bring any documents which could possibly be relevant to the lawsuit. However, use some discretion. If you have three or four banker's boxes full of documents, don't bring all of them. You will only overwhelm the attorney. Make sure you arrive to the appointment on time and get ready to describe your situation. If the lawyer is truly experienced in the area, he will know exactly which questions to ask and will keep you on track. At the end of the meeting, if the lawyer is interested in the case, he will tell you what his fees are. Defense cases are almost always handled on an hourly basis with an initial retainer upfront, so be ready for that. If you feel that the lawyer is sufficiently experienced, and most importantly, if you feel comfortable spending the next year or two dealing with this person, then you should hire them on the spot. If, however, you feel the lawyer is merely a generalist or has not treated you with respect, or he/she just doesn't seem like a good fit, then keep looking.
  4. Litigating the Case: I could go into detail on this point, but I won't. Simply speaking, cooperate with your lawyer. Answer his phone calls promptly and his requests for information.

The above is by no means an exhaustive list.  However, it is a good starting point if you find yourself in the unlucky position of defending a lawsuit.  

 

 

Calling All Defamation, Libel, and Slander Lawyers . . .

Dear respective members of the bar,

If you are an avid reader of this blog, I would appreciate it if you would send me an e-mail or leave a comment below so that we can get in touch. The reason I am asking this is two-fold: (1) I would like to get to know you and see if you have any suggestions for topics I could write about on this blog; and (2) I am considering forming a Defamation Lawyer's Association in Los Angeles, where we would delve into certain topics like Defamation and anti-SLAPP law in greater detail. Your responses would allow me to gauge the interest in such an organization.

Please send me an e-mail and/or leave a comment below.

OFF TOPIC: Funniest Video I've Seen This Year

I know this is old news (and it has nothing to do with defamation law) but the "Double Rainbow" video on YouTube is probably the funniest video I've seen all year. Enjoy. 

 

Why the "Do it Yourself" Mentality Is A Bad Idea

We are a "do it yourself" nation. If you don't believe me, just take a look at the "how to" section of any bookstore or library and you'll see what I'm talking about. There are books on how to do just about anything, including practicing law. Now, I'm not here to knock those kinds of books because they have their place. I understand that the economy is tough for a lot of people and, truthfully, some of these books are a good starting point for common legal issues. But what happens if you're dealing with a very specific and complex legal issue? Do you really think that Internet research will be enough? I think you'd agree with me that it's certainly not enough.

What you need is legal representation from a lawyer who has experience in the kind of case you need to be handled. It is not enough that he or she has practiced for 30 years as a general litigator if you are dealing with a defamation action or a SLAPP case. Nor is it enough that he or she works for a big firm or has a fancy website. The lawyer who you are talking to must have experience dealing with the specific issue you need him or her to handle. Let me give you an example to illustrate.

Today I was in court in Los Angeles on a matter and I happened to notice across the way (in another courtroom) that there was an anti-SLAPP motion on calendar relating to a libel matter. Given that this is one of the main practice areas I concentrate on (and my personal fascination with the topic), I thought it would be interesting to hear the oral argument. Boy was I shocked!

The judge, who has been on the bench for a number of years (and who has a good reputation), totally got the law wrong. I mean, it wasn't even close (I felt compelled to stand up and say something, but thankfully I thought better of it). 

So, if even an experienced and well-regard jurist can get the law wrong, how much more likely will it be that a general civil litigator with little-to-no experience will get it wrong?

My point is: Do not gamble by doing it yourself. This also applies to attorneys as well. I don't know how many times an attorney has called me after the "damage has been done," and they tell me: "gee, I wish I would have called you sooner." Happens a lot.

So do yourself a favor and eliminate the "do it yourself" mentality. You don't pull out your own cavities so don't try to practice law on your own. 

 

What Is The Definition Of Trade Libel?

"Trade libel is defined as an intentional disparagement of the quality of property, which results in pecuniary damage to plaintiff." Erlich v. Etner (1964) 224 Cal.App.2d 69, 73, 36.

 

What Are The Elements Of A Cause Of Action For Trade Libel?

In reviewing some of the topics that we've covered on the California Defamation Blog, I noticed that the topic of Trade Libel is conspicuously absent so I'm going to fix this over the next few posts.

Today's post is short and simple. Here are the basic elements of a cause of action for Trade Libe to get us started:

  1. Defendant's false statement;
  2. Publication;
  3. Of matter disparaging the quality of another person's property or services;
  4. which the publisher intended to cause harm to the owner, or should have recognized as being likely to cause it; and
  5. Causation of pecuniary harm or loss.

Computerexpress, Inc. v. Jackson (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 993, 1010.

In the next post we'll discuss the nature of the tort of Trade Libel.

If you liked this post please subscribe to our newsletter to get a FREE copy of "The Ultimate Beginner's Guide To Defamation Law."

Book Review: Google Bomb

"The day was September 19, 2006, a Tuesday.  It was a little before 2:30 in the afternoon and the weather was sunny in beautiful Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The surf was up just down the street and my stomach was riding a wild wave as the jury of six somberly filed into the nearly empty courtroom.

I had no idea what to expect. David leaned a little closer and whispered, "Well, this is it . . . " I wished for something I could hold onto besides his words since my legs weren't feeling very steady as the bailiff, a very kindly looking older man, intoned, "All rise."

The Honorable Judge John Luzzo, in flowing black robe and wearing his duties with appropriate dignity, took his elevated seat on the bench and asked the foreman, "Has the jury reached a verdict?"

"We have, Your Honor." She handed their verdict to the bailiff, who gave it to the judge--he nodded in seeming approval--then back it went from the judge to the bailiff to the foreman. The air was trapped  in my lungs and the pound of pulsing blood was in my ears as she began to read, line by line, the jury's unanimous decision.

Suddenly I was crying and I couldn't stop the tears that were streaming down my face . . ."

The reason Sue Scheff was crying was because she had just been vindicated. She had just won the largest internet defamation verdict in history in the staggering sum of 11.3 million dollars! But even more important than the substantial award, she had been able to present her story to 6 objective individuals who came to understand her and her terrible situation.

This is the story of Sue Scheff in her book, Google Bomb.

First off, let me say that this book has my highest recommendation. This is the first book review I have done on this blog, and for good reason. I only present extremely high quality information to the readers of this blog. Period.

And this book fits the bill.

Now let me discuss specifically what I enjoyed about the book and why you should buy it right now.

There are two authors.  Sue Scheff and John W. Dozier, Jr. Sue Scheff shares her personal story and all the emotions and feelings that she experienced as a result of being defamed online. She also discusses the litigation process from her point of view, which is eye-opening and instructive for laypersons and lawyers alike.

John W. Dozier, Jr., writes about the legal aspects of a Google Bomb attack and offers expert tips to protect one's reputation online.  John is perhaps the foremost expert in internet defamation law in the country and I respect him tremendously. I believe he is on the right side of this debate and when he writes/talks people listen.

The book is chock-full of expert tips and strategies to manage your reputation online. Pages 203-208 alone are worth the cost of the book.

I would love to write more about the book but I don't want to give away any of the extremely valuable information in there.

Click here right now to add this book to your library.

 

 

 

 

Thank You Dear Readers

We started this blog just over a year ago.

Whether you are a new reader of the California Defamation Law Blog or whether you are one of the first few, I am so thankful to have you here with me. I love writing this blog and so many cool things have happened recently - and all of it - I mean all of it - could not have been possible without you.

While we are a relatively young blog, we have seen great things. For example, we now rank #1 in Google for many important key terms related to defamation law. Take a gander below:

California Defamation Lawyer - Google Search
Anyhow. Just wanted to write a quick post to thank you.
 
I have a lot of exciting things planned for this blog in the upcoming year.

Upcoming Teleseminar: "Protecting and Maximizing Your Online Search Engine Reputation"

On August 28, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time I'll be participating in a highly informative teleseminar with Jay Fleischmann on the topic of:

"Protecting and Maximizing Your Online Search Engine Reputation."

The best part is that it's absolutely FREE!

This call will be full of useful and valuable information you will be able to use immediately to protect and enhance your reputation.  Jay and I really want to help you "claim your name" on Google and the other search engines.

Space is limited so you need to register now before someone takes your spot.  I believe Jay will only be allowing about 250 people to be on the call, and the last I heard, there aren't many spaces left. So don't wait.

All you have to do is go to the following website and become a "fan."  That's all there is to it.

Talk to you soon!

Los Angeles Superior Court Reduces Operations In Wake of Financial Crisis

Los Angeles litigants, lawyers, and court staff just got a jolt of reality this week when the planned "furloughs" began on Wednesday.

If you don't know already, as a result of the financial crisis in California, the Los Angeles Superior Court was required to "substantially reduce its operations and furlough employees the third Wednesday of every month beginning on July 15, 1009." except for essential services. To see a list of essential services click here.

So what does this mean for you? Well, it means that it'll be that much harder to get your case in front of a judge in a timely manner, which I believe, will particularly affect plaintiffs. (I noticed that the court room was extra busy today). It will also mean (likely) that more filing errors will be made because the clerk's office simply does not have enough staff to deal with the current amount of documents being filed every day.

On the bright side, at least courts will remain open to handle essential services. To see a list of essential services click here.

[In reality, there is no bright side because the Court expects the crisis to last at least another four years]

Happy Friday!

If you liked this post please subscribe to the California Defamation Law Newsletter to receive a FREE copy of the "The Ultimate Beginner's Guide To Defamation Law."


Speaking: Social Networking For Lawyers: A Roadmap To Success

I'm pleased to be part of an impressive panel including entertainment attorney Gordon Firemark; class action attorney H. Scott Leviant; Barger & Wolen Marketing Director Heather Milligan, and mediator attorney Victoria Pynchon, to discuss how lawyers can use and benefit from social media.

The Details:

Los Angeles County Bar Association's Second Annual Small Firm and Solo Practitioner Conference, June 24-25.

Social Networking For Lawyers: A Roadmap to Success
Thursday, June 25. 9:15 - 10:30 a.m.

In this interactive session we will explore the buzz surrounding social networking and social media tools and how solo and small firms practitioners can effectively employ them to communicate with current clients; control your messaging as you reach out to new clients and the media; and to meet, network and collaborate with colleagues.

Our panel of solo and small firm attorneys will discuss their experiences with blogging as a social media tool, and we will spotlight several social networking applications, including Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn. By calling upon their personal experiences, our panel will highlight best practices for how you can incorporate these and other Web 2.0 applications into your business development, PR and networking activities.

You don't want to miss this event!