• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Defamation / Cain’s Defamation Lawyer Won’t File Suit

Cain’s Defamation Lawyer Won’t File Suit

November 17, 2011 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

I recently saw an article that discussed whether Herman Cain would file a lawsuit for defamation. Cain has apparently hired a defamation specialist to advise and monitor the situation for him, particularly the proposed joint conference by Cain’s accusers.

If the question is whether Cain will file a lawsuit for defamation, slander, or libel, whatever you want to call it, the answer is: it’s very unlikely. Cain is a public figure. This means that he’d need to show that the accusers made the alleged false and defamatory statements with knowing falsity or a reckless disregard for the truth by clear and convincing evidence. This is a heavy burden to meet, one that very few public figure plaintiffs have been able to satisfy.

Another reason not to sue is the potential application of an anti-SLAPP statute. Depending on the state in which he elects to file suit, his complaint could be subject to speedy dismissal. In about half the states, if a plaintiff files a lawsuit which is based on defendant’s free speech or petitioning activity, the defendant can file a motion seeking the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims. If the plaintiff cannot show a reasonable probability of prevailing on the merits, the case is dismissed, and in many states, plaintiff is ordered to pay the defendant’s attorney’s fees. If his suit were to be dismissed, the public would view it as a vindication of Cain’s accusers. So it’s a big risk.

Finally, filing a lawsuit would put the alleged sexual conduct in issue. In other words, defense counsel would be entitled to dig even deeper into Cain’s personal life. Discovery is very broad in civil suits and you can bet that whatever is discovered would be leaked to the media.

I would be very surprised if Cain elects to file suit. I don’t see any upside to doing it.

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Defamation, Entertainment Defamation Lawyer Tagged With: "Entertainment Defamation Lawyer"

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Si says

    November 17, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    This makes no common sense. If he did these things, the accusers should be free to say them and if he sues them he should be hit in the pocketbook. If they are making them up out of whole cloth, Cain should sue the bejeezus out of them.
    Why cant the system work for truth and not lawyers for once?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in