• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Defamation / 3 Reasons Why A Lawyer Is Unlikely To Take Your Case

3 Reasons Why A Lawyer Is Unlikely To Take Your Case

December 29, 2010 by Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

There are many reasons why a lawyer or attorney is unlikely to take your case. However, I am going to focus on the three most common reasons for purposes of this post. The last one is something that most attorneys will never admit, but it is absolutely true.

1. Not Enough Money Is Involved

The vast majority of potential cases that I receive (and I believe most attorneys receive) are Plaintiff’s cases. This means that the prospective client wants to sue someone else. They usually ask for a contingency fee arrangement, which means that the attorney will agree to defer his/her fees for a percentage of whatever is recovered in the case. Because of the uncertainty of this arrangement, a lawyer is unlikely to take on cases where small damages are involved. What is a small case? I would say that a case where the possible damages are less than $100,000 is not worth it from the point of view of most Plaintiff’s attorneys, at least here in Los Angeles. But every attorney is different, so you never know.

2. Lack of Liability

Liability essentially means whether the person or entity you would like to sue is responsible for what you are saying they did or what you believe they failed to do. Typically when a client comes to me for a consultation I can tell within 2 minutes whether they have a case or not. In many situations, there is a major problem with the case from a liability standpoint. It could be the that the statute of limitations has run or something else. In those kinds of circumstances, an attorney is unlikely to take your case and there is nothing you can really do about it.

3. The "X" Factor

I call it the "X" factor because there is no other way to describe it. It’s the same reason why you’re friends with certain people and why you are not with others. The bottom line is that a lawyer has to feel comfortable with a client. If the client seems mentally unbalanced or particularly high-maintenance, I I will not take the case no matter how good the case might be. And I know other attorneys feel the same way because they’ve told me so.

Bonus Reason: 

Trying to get advice from an attorney for free. This is a big one. Lawyers generally are very busy and they get paid by the hour. Many of my colleagues have complained to me that many potential clients call them up merely to try to squeeze some information out of them. While I don’t blame people for trying to get advice, I think they need to realize that attorneys should be compensated for the advice they give, which, is the product of an expensive education and years of experience. Do not call an attorney merely to seek free advice. Only call or contact an attorney–unless you are calling a legal aid society–if you are capable of paying for legal services.

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Defamation, Orange County Tagged With: orange county

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in