• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / Damages / 3 Key Differences Between Defamation And Trade Libel

3 Key Differences Between Defamation And Trade Libel

January 5, 2010 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

Comparing defamation and trade libel is like comparing apples and oranges. While both are similar (apples and oranges are fruit), they are fundamentally different in other ways.

One key difference between the two is with respect to the harm each is designed to address or protect. Defamation is meant to protect the reputation of the person, whereas trade libel is designed to compensate the plaintiff for pecuniary damage. The reason this distinction is critical is because " . . . trade libel requires pleading and proof of special damages in the form of pecuniary damages." Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co. (1989) 216 Cal.App.3 547, 572. However, proof of special damages solely in the form of pecuniary damages is not required to plead and prove a cause of action for damages.

A second difference is that plaintiff is required to plead and prove that a disparaging statement is false in regard to trade libel, whereas in a cause of action the plaintiff is NOT required to plead that the statements are false in most cases. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School Dist. (1961) 55 Cal.2d 224, 233.

Third, plaintiff may not recover damages for mental distress upon prevailing on a cause of action for trade libel. He or she is limited to the loss of pecuniary damages caused by the libelous statement or statements.

Understanding the differences between these torts will help you plan your strategy, whether you are the plaintiff or the defendant in a case.

If you liked this post please subscribe to our newsletter to get a FREE copy of "The Ultimate Beginner’s Guide To Defamation Law."

 

Buffer Share

Filed Under: Damages, Defamation

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Melissa says

    October 13, 2010 at 2:36 am

    To whom it concerns,
    I have a strong feeling someone is sending out emails in my name saying that I am doing and saying things I am not. Like searches on the internet and just sending out emails that I’m not writing but making it seem as if I am writing them. They are also making it seem as if I am doing weird activity that I am not.
    And they know how I write because they stole all my personal writings in journals so now they think or are making it look as if this is automatically how I talk all the time.
    And I am not just assuming all of this. Some of it has been confirmed directly by other people. It has been going on for four months and it is more than just changing my password; it is a huge privacy and fraud issue because I am being made to look as if I am a certain way that I am not.
    And I do know these people but the longer I wait, the more of a problem it may be. People are discrediting me for baseless reasons. I have screwed up at certain work situations but other than that, not all of this is founded. I do know who these people are, and they are acting as if and making it seem like I didn’t know them either so that also discredits me. This has been damaging to everything.
    They have taken all of my personal information including my phone number and such and put it online for everyone to view. These people have committed so many different areas in the way of crime it seems to me and nobody has done anything. They have accused me of false crimes and just mostly made it look like I am this terrible paranoid crazy person who just wants to be a victim. So even in trying to get help, I’m already coming at people trying to manuever around the fact that they already think that I’m trying to summon up sympathy. Very few people are willing to listen to a crazy person.
    I just want this situation to stop. I am not out for the guys’ or whoever’s money. I just want the whole situation to stop. I do want recompense though for all this mental pain it has caused and for whatever lawyer but this is not my whole point. They have also made it seem like all I care about it money. I have absolutely no first impression left. I want it to stop.
    Melissa

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in