• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607
You are here: Home / anonymous defamation suit / Plaintiffs May Remain Anonymous In Internet Defamation Cases

Plaintiffs May Remain Anonymous In Internet Defamation Cases

November 15, 2008 by Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

Lisa H. Miller writes in the Internet Defamation Law Blog about Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant # 1, 06-1590-cv (2nd Cir. 2008), a case which addresses the question:  "Can a plaintiff sue anonymously in an internet defamation setting?"  The answer is yes, as long as the plaintiff's need to remain anonymous outweighs the public's need for disclosure.  While this decision isn't exactly ground-breaking (since the 9th Circuit already addressed the question of whether a litigant may sue anonymously in Does I through XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2000)), it is instructive because the court listed a set of factors to consider determine whether plaintiff's desire for anonymity outweighs the public's need for disclosure.  For example, "(f) whether defendant is prejudiced by allowing plaintiff to press claims anonymously."  I mean, when wouldn't a defendant be prejudiced by a court allowing plaintiff to file anonymously?

In any event, It will be interesting to see if other courts adopt these factors and how they choose to apply them.


Buffer Share

Filed Under: anonymous defamation suit, Internet Defamation Tagged With: "anonymous defamation suit"

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Maybelle says

    June 6, 2014 at 7:07 am

    It’s really a great and useful piece of info.

    I am glad that you just shared this useful information with us.
    Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in